How Glasgow City Council systematically suppresses walking

I took a walk from the city centre to Pollokshields yesterday to document progress on the construction of the Tradeston cycle route. The junction of Shields Road and St Andrews Drive is being dug up as part of this work, and I was angry to see that no temporary crossings have been provided for pedestrians – despite this very busy junction being part of the walking route to Shields Road subway station. As ever with this council, if you’re on foot, you’re on your own.

WP_20150410_036

WP_20150410_037

The local Conservative councillor David Meikle has promised to chase up my complaint – but I should not have had to complain. I expect pedestrian crossings as a basic right. The level of complacency, laziness, and stupidity that exists within Land and Environmental Services – the diseased council department that has permitted this situation to arise – is staggering. Do they have no standards for pedestrian provision at roadworks? Or do they employ cowboy contractors who blithely ignore those standards?

That leads me on to the question of what exactly it is that Labour Councillor Alistair Watson, the Grand Vizier of Land and Environmental Services, does all day. Not an awful lot, it seems to me. If he had any interest in walking, this would not have happened. It did, so he doesn’t. Q.E.D. An anti-walking greasy-pole-climber like Watson is plainly unfit to have responsibility for the safety of pedestrians.

This also happens to be the kind of thing that scares people off walking – especially children. Which is all to the good, as far as the Labour Party is concerned. They hate pedestrians. Always have, always will.

Follow @carsickglasgow on Twitter

Dead-end campaigning in crap Edinburgh

I attended the Space for Cycling Campaigners’ Training Day in Edinburgh last month. I didn’t really enjoy myself. It was nice to chat to people I’d previously known only through Twitter, but I found many of the pronouncements coming out of the CTC end of the spectrum to be deeply dubious and not particularly useful. We were presented with a booklet entitled “Space for Cycling: A guide for local decision makers”. I think we’ll be up shit creek if this thing gets put in front of politicians. It is an unambitious and incoherent document with more than a few hints of a vehicular cycling hangover. It demands only £10 per head of population for cycling, but £10 per head is not enough.

WP_20150321_005

It asks for segregated (sorry, “protected”, whatever that means) cycle lanes, but immediately waters down this demand with the suggestion that gaps in the segregation are a good idea. It’s cheaper, you see, and it also ties in nicely with the classic CTC “don’t trap me in the gutter” dogma. Obstructions of segregated lanes are also accepted as a fact of life, but they’re nothing that good design and enforcement could not fix.

WP_20150321_010

It also insists that lack of road space should not be used as an excuse not to segregate, while simultaneously endorsing unsegregated cycle lanes where roads are “narrower”. They can’t have it both ways.

WP_20150321_006

Oh, and pedestrians and cyclists “mix happily”, don’t you know?

WP_20150321_012

Unbelievably, the CTC are still using their notorious photo of Gilbert Road, Cambridge, to illustrate desirable cycling infrastructure:

WP_20150221_002

And now here’s a piece of brand-new infrastructure on Market Street, Edinburgh, which exactly matches the CTC template for “safe space for cycling, for everyone”:

WP_20150221_014

Remarkably inviting, is it not? Yes, there was much enthusiasm for the various activities of the City of Edinburgh Council at the event. Councillor Jim Orr would have had us believe that the council is working hard to make real progress and deserves support. Many of the attendees thrilled to the imminent imposition of 20mph speed limits without traffic calming on 80% of Edinburgh’s streets – a move that will allegedly unlock the potential of walking and cycling, generate a cultural change among drivers, foster more community spirit, and all the rest of it – and all for hardly any money! This policy appeals to vehicular cycling campaigners, who wrongly regard it as rendering segregation unnecessary, but it’s also attractive to the car-centric local council, because it requires no challenge to the dominance of the car on the streets while creating the illusion that something is being done to help pedestrians and cyclists.

Me, I think it’s hokum. The notion that drivers can be convinced to be more considerate by putting a sign on a pole is beyond belief. Everyone prefers to ignore one of the findings (p10) of the South Central Edinburgh trial of 20mph limits without traffic calming – that, despite a drop in speeds, the average speed remained above the 20mph limit. That trial applied only to back streets, so it’s a near certainty that such a limit applied to unaltered main roads will be flouted to a spectacular extent. The reality is that compliance with 20mph speed limits depends on the presence of large-scale traffic calming – raised tables, tighter junction geometry, that sort of thing. That these measures are expensive is a lazy myth – they only look expensive in the context of schemes to benefit pedestrians, who are not important to any level of UK government. Their cost is insignificant compared to the untold billions lavished on schemes to benefit drivers. And anyway, their expense is irrelevant to their necessity.

I’ll leave you with these photos of the brutal racetrack known as Leith Walk (where inadequate planned walking and cycling infrastructure improvements are now seemingly caught up in the impenetrable machinations of local government), and the kind of location where I’m supposed to believe a 20mph limit is going to make all the difference. Note the pedestrians perched on the narrow central reservation, struggling to get across due to the council’s failure to provide adequate crossing facilities. Note also the absence of any cyclists.

WP_001954

WP_001959

WP_001960

And here’s a nasty, victim-blaming sign on the same road. There have plainly been Accidents here, and in the minds of the kind of people who dominate the UK’s transport establishment, they’re all the fault of pedestrians.

WP_001956

Will some crap cycle lanes and a 20mph limit kick-start the revolution here? I don’t think so. The City of Edinburgh Council is profoundly hostile to both pedestrians any cyclists. Pretending otherwise does not help.

Follow @carsickglasgow on Twitter

A six-year wait for a dropped kerb

Last year, I noted the continuing absence of a dropped kerb at the pedestrian crossing of the bus station at Partick Interchange, the third-busiest railway station in the city. Well, Glasgow’s sluggish council has finally got round to installing the dropped kerb. This council’s contempt for wheelchair users could scarcely be more evident than in the case of this scandalous delay. And just look at how cheaply it was done. It isn’t even flush with the road. Pathetic.

WP_20150317_001

Follow @carsickglasgow on Twitter

War on pedestrians and cyclists – latest

This is in the city centre. If there’s anywhere that shared use isn’t appropriate, it’s here. Glasgow City Council understands nothing whatever about walking or cycling, and cares even less. 14 car parking spaces are far more important to them than segregated cycleways. Object.

montrose

Follow @carsickglasgow on Twitter

A “Super Local Authority”!

Cooncil:

The plans to promote WWF’s Earth Hour, where millions of people from all over the world will switch off lights in a symbolic display of environmental awareness, have earned the council the title of Super Local Authority. Organised as part of Glasgow’s Green Year 2015 campaign, the event will demonstrate the city’s commitment to building a sustainable future and tackling climate change.

Yes, the same council that teamed up with the Scottish Government to defy a public inquiry and poison your air now wants you to believe they’re “building a sustainable future”. I personally will not be participating in this patronising, hypocritical farce. I’m not interested in living in darkness for an hour. It achieves nothing.

There will apparently be “a range of fun activities to try”, including:

A “Murder Mile” Walk starting on the Square

That sounds tasteful.

Pavegen energy generating mat for a dance group to perform on wearing glowbands, etc.

An Illuminated Bike Ride out to the City’s East End leading off from the square

A Cycle Powered Film Projection and other Cycle Generated Power Demonstrations

Token gestures and laughable techno-gimmicks – stock-in-trade for Labour “environmentalists”, whose enfeebled vision of a greener future spells nothing but disaster for our planet’s climate. Not for them restraints on car use and an end to overconsumption – ideas like that are firmly in the “too much work” pile. If there’s one thing this council hates, it’s doing work. Ask them to replace a bollard, or stop the paths along the Clyde collapsing into the river, and they act like you’re asking for a miracle – but somehow there’s cash to be frittered away on “illuminated bike rides”. We’re through the looking glass now.

“I don’t want to go among mad people”, Alice remarked.

“Oh, you can’t help that”, said the Council. “We’re all mad here”.

Follow @carsickglasgow on Twitter